Last week, California’s governor approved a bill providing that on and after January 1, 2010, any instrument, whenever executed, that became irrevocable on or after January 1, 2001 the law regarding no contest clauses will change.
Existing law, in relation to wills, trusts, and other instruments, defines and regulates no contest clauses, which are provisions in otherwise valid instruments that, if enforced, penalize beneficiaries if the beneficiaries file a contest with the court. Existing law provides that a no contest clause in a will or a trust is generally enforceable and defines a “contest” and “direct contest” in this regard. Existing law provides that certain actions do not constitute a contest unless expressly identified in the no contest clause as a violation. Existing law exempts certain contests from the enforcement of the no contest clause under specified circumstances, including if there is reasonable cause to believe that instrument has been revoked. Existing law permits a beneficiary to apply to a court for a determination of whether a particular motion, petition, or other act by the beneficiary would be a contest within the terms of a no contest clause.
This bill, beginning January 1, 2010, would revise, recast, and clarify these provisions. The bill would limit the application of a no contest clause to specific contests. The bill would redefine “direct contest,” and would provide that a no contest clause may be enforced against a direct contest only when it is brought without probable cause, which the bill would define for these purposes. The bill would delete the provisions regarding the authority of a beneficiary to apply to a court for a determination regarding a no contest clause, as described above.